 <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Communications of the ACM on Data in Flight (or maybe DBAs in Fright)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tibcoblogs.com/cep/index.php/2010/02/12/communications-of-the-acm-on-data-in-flight-or-maybe-dbas-in-fright/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tibcoblogs.com/cep/2010/02/12/communications-of-the-acm-on-data-in-flight-or-maybe-dbas-in-fright/</link>
	<description>Complex Event Processing (CEP)</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul Vincent</title>
		<link>http://tibcoblogs.com/cep/2010/02/12/communications-of-the-acm-on-data-in-flight-or-maybe-dbas-in-fright/comment-page-1/#comment-1073</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Vincent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 16:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tibcoblogs.com/cep/?p=1088#comment-1073</guid>
		<description>Opher has posted details of the &lt;a href="http://cacm.acm.org/magazines/2010/5/87250-roots-of-publication-delay/fulltext#body-3" rel="nofollow"&gt;response&lt;/a&gt; to this ACM article on his &lt;a href="http://epthinking.blogspot.com/2010/04/letter-to-editor-in-communications-of.html " rel="nofollow"&gt;blog&lt;/a&gt;.

As usual, Opher's response is far more diplomatic than mine :) and, this being the ACM, the original author was granted leave to reply to Opher's points. Unfortunately, albeit not surprisingly, I don't think the article author makes a very good defence (sorry Julian!), trying to excuse the article as being from a BI perspective.

Amongst the claims in the response:
1 - EPTS fails to address the needs of the data warehouse community
= why should it? What has data warehousing got to do with event processing, except as a repository of past events???
2 - SQL is the lingua franca of the BI community, therefore streaming queries allow BI (folk) to address new problems
= ah, the old "re-use your SQL skills" argument... although I would argue that real analysts - like TIBCO Spotfire users - are probably using higher level tools than SQL!!!

Oh well! C'est la vie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Opher has posted details of the <a href="http://cacm.acm.org/magazines/2010/5/87250-roots-of-publication-delay/fulltext#body-3" rel="nofollow">response</a> to this ACM article on his <a href="http://epthinking.blogspot.com/2010/04/letter-to-editor-in-communications-of.html " rel="nofollow">blog</a>.</p>
<p>As usual, Opher&#8217;s response is far more diplomatic than mine <img src='http://tibcoblogs.com/cep/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> and, this being the ACM, the original author was granted leave to reply to Opher&#8217;s points. Unfortunately, albeit not surprisingly, I don&#8217;t think the article author makes a very good defence (sorry Julian!), trying to excuse the article as being from a BI perspective.</p>
<p>Amongst the claims in the response:<br />
1 - EPTS fails to address the needs of the data warehouse community<br />
= why should it? What has data warehousing got to do with event processing, except as a repository of past events???<br />
2 - SQL is the lingua franca of the BI community, therefore streaming queries allow BI (folk) to address new problems<br />
= ah, the old &#8220;re-use your SQL skills&#8221; argument&#8230; although I would argue that real analysts - like TIBCO Spotfire users - are probably using higher level tools than SQL!!!</p>
<p>Oh well! C&#8217;est la vie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Vincent</title>
		<link>http://tibcoblogs.com/cep/2010/02/12/communications-of-the-acm-on-data-in-flight-or-maybe-dbas-in-fright/comment-page-1/#comment-1003</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Vincent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 14:27:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tibcoblogs.com/cep/?p=1088#comment-1003</guid>
		<description>Thanks Opher - look forward to you setting the ACM straight :)
Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Opher - look forward to you setting the ACM straight <img src='http://tibcoblogs.com/cep/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Opher Etzion</title>
		<link>http://tibcoblogs.com/cep/2010/02/12/communications-of-the-acm-on-data-in-flight-or-maybe-dbas-in-fright/comment-page-1/#comment-1002</link>
		<dc:creator>Opher Etzion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 18:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tibcoblogs.com/cep/?p=1088#comment-1002</guid>
		<description>Thanks Paul for noticing it,  I have approached the CACM editor-in-chief to attract his attention to inaccuracies in this article, and asking him about the procedure  to write a short commentary responding to  it,  waiting for response.

Opher</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Paul for noticing it,  I have approached the CACM editor-in-chief to attract his attention to inaccuracies in this article, and asking him about the procedure  to write a short commentary responding to  it,  waiting for response.</p>
<p>Opher</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

