 <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is MDM the way to manage event patterns, rules, &amp; decisions in an IT system?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tibcoblogs.com/cep/index.php/2010/01/28/is-mdm-the-way-to-manage-event-patterns-rules-decisions-in-an-it-system/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tibcoblogs.com/cep/2010/01/28/is-mdm-the-way-to-manage-event-patterns-rules-decisions-in-an-it-system/</link>
	<description>Complex Event Processing (CEP)</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul Vincent</title>
		<link>http://tibcoblogs.com/cep/2010/01/28/is-mdm-the-way-to-manage-event-patterns-rules-decisions-in-an-it-system/comment-page-1/#comment-998</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Vincent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 11:58:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tibcoblogs.com/cep/?p=1060#comment-998</guid>
		<description>Hi Ian - I would expect that *some*, but not *all*, concepts in a BE application (eg for CEP) would be managed as master data (ie under CIM). As of BE3 this would indeed be a manual synchronisation of the 2 models... originally mentioned &lt;a href="http://tibcoblogs.com/cep/2007/07/19/cep-as-sauce-for-alphabet-soup-part-8-mdm/" rel="nofollow"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;...
Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ian - I would expect that *some*, but not *all*, concepts in a BE application (eg for CEP) would be managed as master data (ie under CIM). As of BE3 this would indeed be a manual synchronisation of the 2 models&#8230; originally mentioned <a href="http://tibcoblogs.com/cep/2007/07/19/cep-as-sauce-for-alphabet-soup-part-8-mdm/" rel="nofollow">here</a>&#8230;<br />
Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ian Phillips</title>
		<link>http://tibcoblogs.com/cep/2010/01/28/is-mdm-the-way-to-manage-event-patterns-rules-decisions-in-an-it-system/comment-page-1/#comment-997</link>
		<dc:creator>ian Phillips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 16:32:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tibcoblogs.com/cep/?p=1060#comment-997</guid>
		<description>Having the CIM act as a concept model is what I was getting at. It's not a huge burden to keep 2 separate models in sync, it just would have been nice to have some tool support (and to be clear here I mean at design time, I wouldn't expect BE to query an CIM/MDM store at runtime).

Cheers,
Ian.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having the CIM act as a concept model is what I was getting at. It&#8217;s not a huge burden to keep 2 separate models in sync, it just would have been nice to have some tool support (and to be clear here I mean at design time, I wouldn&#8217;t expect BE to query an CIM/MDM store at runtime).</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Ian.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Vincent</title>
		<link>http://tibcoblogs.com/cep/2010/01/28/is-mdm-the-way-to-manage-event-patterns-rules-decisions-in-an-it-system/comment-page-1/#comment-972</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Vincent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 22:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tibcoblogs.com/cep/?p=1060#comment-972</guid>
		<description>Hi Ian - 

It's a CIM (and BE) customisation at present - eg in AFF. Clearly representing BE ontology components in CIM is more involved than just rule or query parameters (that can be updated via a simple EMS message).

But there is no reason a CIM data source for example could not be a type of BE concept model, like DBConcepts. Although the idea above is more about using CIM as a rule/query/EPL etc repository...

Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ian - </p>
<p>It&#8217;s a CIM (and BE) customisation at present - eg in AFF. Clearly representing BE ontology components in CIM is more involved than just rule or query parameters (that can be updated via a simple EMS message).</p>
<p>But there is no reason a CIM data source for example could not be a type of BE concept model, like DBConcepts. Although the idea above is more about using CIM as a rule/query/EPL etc repository&#8230;</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ian Phillips</title>
		<link>http://tibcoblogs.com/cep/2010/01/28/is-mdm-the-way-to-manage-event-patterns-rules-decisions-in-an-it-system/comment-page-1/#comment-970</link>
		<dc:creator>ian Phillips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 09:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tibcoblogs.com/cep/?p=1060#comment-970</guid>
		<description>“And, er, CEP.”

So, getting into the nitty gritty… does CIM have a way to expose it’s model as ontology in BE or would I have to manually create concepts to match the MDM?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“And, er, CEP.”</p>
<p>So, getting into the nitty gritty… does CIM have a way to expose it’s model as ontology in BE or would I have to manually create concepts to match the MDM?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

