http://tibcoblogs.com/cep/2007/04/09/why-rules-in-cep/ Complex Event Processing (CEP) Sat, 11 Feb 2012 17:43:11 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1 hourly 1 http://tibcoblogs.com/cep/2007/04/09/why-rules-in-cep/comment-page-1/#comment-20 How much of CEP is rules? » TIBCO’s Complex Event Processing Blog Mon, 25 Jun 2007 10:12:19 +0000 http://tibcoblogs.com/cep/2007/04/11/why-rules-in-cep/#comment-20 [...] Naturally, rules are a very useful tool for CEP. But if you check something like the JDL model for the typical processes (event pre-processing, event refinement, situation refinement, impact assessment, and process refinement) that are involved in CEP, you can guess that these could also be implemented in other ways, such as hard-coded in 3GL or scripts (not very flexible), or even mapped using a neural net (such as in this example). Filed in: Complex Event Processing (CEP), Rules bookmark with del.icio.us   digg this About this Blog This blog's objective is to bring TIBCO closer to our customers, potential customers, analysts, partners, and employees. Please join the discussion and add smart comments frequently. The opinions expressed here are those of the individuals and not reviewed by anyone but the individual authors. While they are employed by TIBCO, neither TIBCO nor anybody else necessarily agrees with them. [...] [...] Naturally, rules are a very useful tool for CEP. But if you check something like the JDL model for the typical processes (event pre-processing, event refinement, situation refinement, impact assessment, and process refinement) that are involved in CEP, you can guess that these could also be implemented in other ways, such as hard-coded in 3GL or scripts (not very flexible), or even mapped using a neural net (such as in this example). Filed in: Complex Event Processing (CEP), Rules bookmark with del.icio.us   digg this About this Blog This blog’s objective is to bring TIBCO closer to our customers, potential customers, analysts, partners, and employees. Please join the discussion and add smart comments frequently. The opinions expressed here are those of the individuals and not reviewed by anyone but the individual authors. While they are employed by TIBCO, neither TIBCO nor anybody else necessarily agrees with them. [...]

]]> http://tibcoblogs.com/cep/2007/04/09/why-rules-in-cep/comment-page-1/#comment-17 Semantic Technologies and CEP (2): A short detour to rule standards » TIBCO’s Complex Event Processing Blog Mon, 11 Jun 2007 19:29:39 +0000 http://tibcoblogs.com/cep/2007/04/11/why-rules-in-cep/#comment-17 [...] Rule standards are making progress. Rules are the brains behind CEP (as commented on earlier), while the event infrastructure provides the backbone. The OMG Production Rule Representation (PRR) effort [*1] (as discussed by PRR chair James Taylor) is close to completion as a rule modeling standard for “standard” (data driven) rule engines; the W3C RIF effort has already had an attempt to make it work in the real world (as discussed by Mark Proctor). New at Innsbruck during ESWC was the start of the PR version of RIF work (indeed before the slowly-progressing “RIF Core” has been completed). There was a “frank and vigorous exchange of views” in the first meeting and it became rapidly apparent that there was interest in covering all aspects of “Event Condition Action” rules including a whole new-to-me rule terminology such as action rules, reaction rules, reactive rules, etc, as well as rules for event processing (including both complex and streaming events)… [...] [...] Rule standards are making progress. Rules are the brains behind CEP (as commented on earlier), while the event infrastructure provides the backbone. The OMG Production Rule Representation (PRR) effort [*1] (as discussed by PRR chair James Taylor) is close to completion as a rule modeling standard for “standard” (data driven) rule engines; the W3C RIF effort has already had an attempt to make it work in the real world (as discussed by Mark Proctor). New at Innsbruck during ESWC was the start of the PR version of RIF work (indeed before the slowly-progressing “RIF Core” has been completed). There was a “frank and vigorous exchange of views” in the first meeting and it became rapidly apparent that there was interest in covering all aspects of “Event Condition Action” rules including a whole new-to-me rule terminology such as action rules, reaction rules, reactive rules, etc, as well as rules for event processing (including both complex and streaming events)… [...]

]]> http://tibcoblogs.com/cep/2007/04/09/why-rules-in-cep/comment-page-1/#comment-15 Semantic Technologies and CEP (1): Intro » TIBCO’s Complex Event Processing Blog Thu, 24 May 2007 16:28:08 +0000 http://tibcoblogs.com/cep/2007/04/11/why-rules-in-cep/#comment-15 [...] The Semantic Technology Conference 2007 [1] was an interesting event (even including the update on rule standards given by your erstwhile TIBCO rep). So what are semantic technologies, and what do they offer the CEP world today? [...] [...] The Semantic Technology Conference 2007 [1] was an interesting event (even including the update on rule standards given by your erstwhile TIBCO rep). So what are semantic technologies, and what do they offer the CEP world today? [...]

]]>